Revise the project after feedback

Where we are on the map

Trace the four nodes of the support map with a finger and name the job of each one. Then hide it. Colours make the checking sequence visible; they do not stand in for evidence. If a node lacks information, leave it blank and explain why. These figures are invented practice data, not statistics from a real library.

A real-life scene

During rehearsal, a listener sees the library on the right of the fictional map while the directions say left. The group checks the viewpoint and corrects one version.

Listen and respond

Listen: Ескертуіңізге рақмет. — Thank you for the feedback.

Listen: Қай қадам түсініксіз болды? — Which step was unclear?

Listen: Карта мен мәтін сәйкес келмейді. — The map and text do not match.

Listen: Бастау орнын қайта тексерейік. — Let us recheck the starting point.

Listen: Мәтіндегі бағытты түзеттік. — We corrected the direction in the text.

Listen: Енді жолды қайта оқып көріңіз. — Now try following the route again.

How to practise

First listen with the transcript hidden and state the main point even if you miss some words. On a second pass write only anchor words and numbers; on a third, open the text and find one error in your initial prediction. Repeat the full Kazakh sentence at a natural pace rather than spelling it out. If a detail remains unclear, use the repair question from lesson 60 and ask a partner to repeat just that part.

The precise model

Feedback is not a verdict. Find the mismatch, check both sources, correct one line and ask someone else to follow it. Сәйкес келмейді names a conflict; түзеттік reports a completed change. Keep before and after versions so the reason remains visible.

Support signal

ЕСКЕРТУ → ТЕКСЕРУ → ТҮЗЕТУ → ҚАЙТА СЫНАУ

Limit of the rule

If feedback concerns a fact, do not edit merely because one listener sounds certain. Verify the observation or source first.

Predict before the explanation

Before reading the model, write the conclusion you expect and what you can actually verify. Name one word or number that might change your answer. Compare your prediction with the evidence afterward; revising it is a sign of careful reading, not failure.

Recall without the support

Hide the text and diagram. Sketch four nodes in one minute, say two connected Kazakh sentences, and explain to a partner where the known information ends. Reopen the page, compare every detail and repair one imprecise word.

Find and repair the mistake

The group changes the map but leaves the old text. Find the second place and make them agree.

Transfer to a new scene

Another reader asks for larger map labels. Improve readability without changing the route’s meaning.

Change to the My World project

My World 2.1 remains a fictional learning guide without personal data. For every conclusion keep the original message, the date you checked it, and what you still do not know. Keep three columns in My World 3.0: feedback, check, correction. Do not record the reviewer’s name.

Exercise

Find the contradiction between map and text. Describe feedback, check and revision in Kazakh, then have another learner follow the route.

Review after 1, 7 and 30 days

• Tomorrow listen to one line without text and recover its meaning and source.
• After seven days apply the same map to a new fictional notice or a fresh set of numbers.
• After thirty days explain your decision to someone else without the map and ask them to find an unsupported part.

Next lesson: A five-minute presentation in your own words