Course finale: an independent conversation and project defence

Where we are on the map

Trace the four nodes of the support map with a finger and name the job of each one. Then hide it. Colours make the checking sequence visible; they do not stand in for evidence. If a node lacks information, leave it blank and explain why. These figures are invented practice data, not statistics from a real library.

A real-life scene

A new fictional cultural center changes its entrance. You have an old map, a new notice with no effective date and a listener asking about an accessible route. Defend what you know; do not invent the rest.

Listen and respond

Listen: Бұл — біздің орта туралы жолсілтеме. — This is our guide to our neighborhood.

Listen: Ескі картада кіреберіс сол жақта. — The old map puts the entrance on the left.

Listen: Жаңа хабардың күшіне енетін күні белгісіз. — The effective date of the new notice is unknown.

Listen: Қолжетімді жолды бөлек тексеру керек. — The accessible route needs a separate check.

Listen: Сізге қай мәлімет керек? — Which information do you need?

Listen: Түзетуді тексерген соң енгіземіз. — We will update it after checking.

How to practise

First listen with the transcript hidden and state the main point even if you miss some words. On a second pass write only anchor words and numbers; on a third, open the text and find one error in your initial prediction. Repeat the full Kazakh sentence at a natural pace rather than spelling it out. If a detail remains unclear, use the repair question from lesson 60 and ask a partner to repeat just that part.

The precise model

Build an honest tool, not a perfect poster. Separate the old map from the new notice, find the effective date, and do not infer accessibility from one picture. Ask what the listener needs, answer from evidence, name the gap and how to check it. Record a verified correction after feedback.

Support signal

ТЫҢДА → ТЕКСЕР → ТҮСІНДІР → ТҮЗЕТ

Limit of the rule

Completing 80 lessons does not certify B1. The evidence is what you can do: understand a question, answer, read a source, write a message and correct it.

Predict before the explanation

Before reading the model, write the conclusion you expect and what you can actually verify. Name one word or number that might change your answer. Compare your prediction with the evidence afterward; revising it is a sign of careful reading, not failure.

Recall without the support

Hide the text and diagram. Sketch four nodes in one minute, say two connected Kazakh sentences, and explain to a partner where the known information ends. Reopen the page, compare every detail and repair one imprecise word.

Find and repair the mistake

A learner says the new entrance already operates and is “accessible to everyone.” Find both unsupported claims and revise the message.

Transfer to a new scene

A partner supplies the effective date, but there is still no ramp information. Update only the date claim and leave accessibility open.

Change to the My World project

My World 2.1 remains a fictional learning guide without personal data. For every conclusion keep the original message, the date you checked it, and what you still do not know. My World 3.0 contains an audience-specific guide, sourced route, separate opinion, check-and-revision log, oral defence and answer to a new question, without personal data.

Exercise

Final task: complete the guide, listen to the new situation twice, discuss it without a script, write a corrected card and explain what is still unknown.

Review after 1, 7 and 30 days

• Tomorrow listen to one line without text and recover its meaning and source.
• After seven days apply the same map to a new fictional notice or a fresh set of numbers.
• After thirty days explain your decision to someone else without the map and ask them to find an unsupported part.

Course contents