Write a clear public note without overclaiming

Where we are on the map

Trace the four nodes of the support map with a finger and name the job of each one. Then hide it. Colours make the checking sequence visible; they do not stand in for evidence. If a node lacks information, leave it blank and explain why. These figures are invented practice data, not statistics from a real library.

A real-life scene

Your group prepares a guide page for other learners. A short note must explain the practice chart without presenting invented values as real library statistics.

Listen and respond

Listen: Бұл — оқу мысалы, нақты есеп емес. — This is a practice example, not an actual report.

Listen: Кесте үш күнді ғана қамтиды. — The table covers only three days.

Listen: Сейсенбіде он сегіз адам көрсетілген. — Tuesday shows eighteen people.

Listen: Бұл басқа апталар туралы айтпайды. — This says nothing about other weeks.

Listen: Дереккөз: топтың оқу кестесі. — Source: the group’s practice table.

Listen: Жаңа мәлімет болса, жазбаны жаңартамыз. — We will update the note if new data arrive.

How to practise

First listen with the transcript hidden and state the main point even if you miss some words. On a second pass write only anchor words and numbers; on a third, open the text and find one error in your initial prediction. Repeat the full Kazakh sentence at a natural pace rather than spelling it out. If a detail remains unclear, use the repair question from lesson 60 and ask a partner to repeat just that part.

The precise model

A card answers five questions in order: what kind of material, whose source, what period and unit, what the numbers show, and what they do not show. “Tuesday had the most among three days” is more honest than “the library is always full on Tuesdays.” Separate your judgement from the report.

Support signal

МӘРТЕБЕ → ДЕРЕККӨЗ → НЕ КӨРІНЕДІ → НЕ БЕЛГІСІЗ

Limit of the rule

Do not publish visitor names, phone numbers or classmates’ photos to make the card persuasive. Fictional, non-identifying numbers are enough for practice.

Predict before the explanation

Before reading the model, write the conclusion you expect and what you can actually verify. Name one word or number that might change your answer. Compare your prediction with the evidence afterward; revising it is a sign of careful reading, not failure.

Recall without the support

Hide the text and diagram. Sketch four nodes in one minute, say two connected Kazakh sentences, and explain to a partner where the known information ends. Reopen the page, compare every detail and repair one imprecise word.

Find and repair the mistake

“The library is overcrowded on Tuesday” turns 18 visitors into a claim about capacity. Rewrite the headline within the evidence.

Transfer to a new scene

You receive a table with another date but the same numbers. Which lines of the card must change even though the bars look identical?

Change to the My World project

My World 2.1 remains a fictional learning guide without personal data. For every conclusion keep the original message, the date you checked it, and what you still do not know. Save the verified 2.1 card, original practice table and correction log. Another reader should be able to reproduce your conclusion.

Exercise

Write an 80–110-word Kazakh project note. Include “practice data,” three days, unit, one precise comparison, source and one unknown. Let a partner verify every number.

Review after 1, 7 and 30 days

• Tomorrow listen to one line without text and recover its meaning and source.
• After seven days apply the same map to a new fictional notice or a fresh set of numbers.
• After thirty days explain your decision to someone else without the map and ask them to find an unsupported part.

Next lesson: Mastery checkpoint 2.1: report data and defend a conclusion